All Proven Results - Full Test Data and Findings | Bodywell®

All Proven Results.
Full test data and findings.

Comprehensive record of measurement results across the four research categories - SAR, EEG, pH, and thermal. Tables, charts, source documentation, and links to deep-dive methodology pages.

Learn how this was tested →

SAR Test Results 6 measurements EEG Findings 6 subjects pH Bio-Stabilization CUNY chart Thermal Imaging FLIR data

SAR · Specific Absorption Rate

SAR test results - up to 80% reduction.

Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) measures the rate at which radio-frequency energy is absorbed by tissue from a wireless device, expressed in watts per kilogram. The FCC regulatory ceiling for U.S. devices is 1.6 W/kg. Six independent device measurements were conducted at RF Exposure Lab using sugar-based brain-tissue simulant. Reductions ranged from 58.9% to 80.1%.

Institution: RF Exposure Lab, San Marcos, CA Accreditation: FCC #2387.01 Equipment: DASY52 by SPEAG Standard: FCC OET Bulletin 65 Supp C

SAR Data Summary excerpt - Galaxy S3, Chip 192, head SAR test, -80.3% percentage SAR change, signed by Jay M. Moulton (VP, RF Exposure Lab) — RF Exposure Lab SAR Data Summary excerpt - signed by VP Jay M. Moulton

Device · Band	Reference	With BioChip	Reduction
Device 1 · 836 MHz	0.485 W/kg	0.177 W/kg	−63.5%
Device 2 · 836 MHz	0.485 W/kg	0.156 W/kg	−67.8%
Device 3 · 836 MHz	0.206 W/kg	0.041 W/kg	−80.1%
Device 4 · 836 MHz	0.236 W/kg	0.097 W/kg	−58.9%
Device 5 · 1880 MHz	0.195 W/kg	0.046 W/kg	−76.4%
Device 6 · 1950 MHz	0.312 W/kg	0.121 W/kg	−61.2%

−77%

Independent confirmatory measurement Dr. Nachaat Mazeh (Beaumont Health Research Institute) - independent test device, 836.6 MHz, sugar-based simulant. Within the Einat-summary range.

Named Contributors Executive summary compiled by Prof. Moshe Einat (Ariel University). Methodology and analysis cross-reviewed by Prof. Motti Haridim (Holon Institute of Technology) and Dr. Mazeh.

Signal-Integrity Verification Independent TRP/TIS testing at the same FCC-accredited lab confirmed no measurable impact on signal transmission or reception. The BioChip does not block, attenuate, or interfere with cellular signal.

Deep dive: SAR study methodology, full report, and FAQ

EEG · Bioelectrical Brain Activity

EEG findings - alpha-rhythm increase in 6 of 6 subjects.

Clinical EEG pilot recording brain alpha-rhythm parameters (alpha-index and alpha-power) under four sequential conditions per subject: baseline, BioCard alone, phone alone, phone + BioCard. Conducted under International 10-20 electrode placement and ASET-aligned protocols. Six healthy adult subjects; each subject served as their own control across the four conditions.

Investigator: Regina Shmelkina Protocol: ASET-aligned clinical EEG Electrodes: International 10-20 placement Subjects: 6 healthy adults

EEG recordings before (without BioCard) and after (with BioCard) - six EEG channels showing changes in alpha-rhythm activity — EEG recordings - before (no BioCard) vs after (with BioCard), six channels

Subject	Background	Phone alone	Phone + BioCard	Δ Idx
1	8.9% · 77	10.2% · 89	21% · 117	+10.8 pp
2	91.5% · 98	52% · 115	55% · 214	+3.0 pp
3	82% · 67	73% · 53	75% · 80	+2.0 pp
4	22% · 62	69% · 67	80% · 67	+11.0 pp
5	96% · 101	89% · 83	95% · 117	+6.0 pp
6	28% · 86	92% · 98	93.5% · 93	+1.5 pp

6 / 6

Alpha-index increase across the cohort Every subject's alpha-index increased when the BioCard was applied during cellphone exposure, compared to phone alone. Alpha-power increased in 4 of 6 subjects. Statistical ratio: 1.34 ± 0.33 (P = 68%).

Cell Format Each cell shows alpha-index (% of recording time) · alpha-power (average amplitude). "pp" = percentage points. Source: Table 1, Shmelkina report.

Independent Review Methodology and conclusions independently reviewed by Prof. Moshe Einat (Ariel University) and Prof. Motti Haridim (Holon Institute of Technology).

Deep dive: EEG study methodology, full report, and FAQ

pH · Cellular Bio-Stabilization

pH measurement - water chemistry under exposure.

Continuous pH measurement of water during cellphone exposure, conducted at the New York City College of Technology (City University of New York). Custom-built differential pH meter with 0.0242 pH-per-division resolution. Same vessel of water, same cellphone, same room across both sessions; the BioCard's presence was the single varied input.

Institution: NYC College of Technology · CUNY Investigators: Prof. Aron Goykadosh, Dr. Mark Krinker Equipment: Custom differential pH meter Resolution: 0.0242 pH per division

CUNY pH bar chart - without BioCard pH drops from 7.25 to 6.80 over 20 minutes; with BioCard pH stays stable around 7.30 — CUNY pH bar chart - Blue = without BioCard, Red = with BioCard

Time	Without BioCard	With BioCard	Δ
0 min	7.25	7.25	-
4 min	7.15	7.28	+0.13
8 min	6.90	7.28	+0.38
12 min	6.85	7.30	+0.45
16 min	6.80	7.30	+0.50
20 min	6.85	7.30	+0.45

≈ 0

Stable pH across exposure window With the BioCard in place, water pH remained stable at ≈ 7.25–7.30 across 20 minutes of cellphone exposure. Without the BioCard, pH drifted into the acidic range, ending at ≈ 6.80–6.85.

Replication Same direction-of-effect documented across three different test devices and two different operating modes (active and standby).

Equalizer Verification Confirmed independently by placing the MobileTek Equalizer between the test device and the water vessel - the BioCard configuration is not required to be on the device for the effect to be documented.

Deep dive: pH study methodology, theoretical framework, and FAQ

Thermal · FLIR Imaging

Thermal imaging - peak skin heating reduced ~50%.

FLIR thermal imaging of skin and underlying tissue temperature during sustained cellphone use. Conducted under IAMT head-and-neck protocol with subjects oriented by Reid's base line. Same device, posture, room, and 45-minute exposure window across both sessions; the BioChip's presence was the single varied input. All measurements taken at the same anatomical point (right pinna of the ear).

Author: Dr. Nachaat Mazeh, PhD Institution: Beaumont Health Research Institute Test Site: Green Health Thermography (Ann Arbor, MI) Camera: FLIR A320 (sensitivity <0.05°C)

FLIR thermography sequences - Before (without BioChip) showing intense red and white hot zones developing on the head, and After (with BioChip) showing markedly reduced heating across the same time intervals — FLIR sequences - Before (no BioChip) vs After (with BioChip)

Condition	Duration	Peak temperature	Δ from baseline
Baseline (no phone)	15 min acclimation	35.04°C	- reference -
Phone alone	45 min talk mode	37.08°C	+2.04°C
Phone + BioChip	45 min talk mode	36.07°C	+1.01°C

≈ ½

Peak temperature increase reduced ~50% Phone alone produced a +2.04°C rise over 45 minutes of continuous talk-mode use. With the BioChip on the battery compartment under identical protocol, the rise was +1.01°C - approximately half the heating, on the same person, in the same chair, in the same room.

Cooling-Curve Recovery After phone removal, the IR camera continued recording. With phone alone, skin temperature had not returned to baseline after 10 minutes of cooling. With the BioChip, recovery was documented at 11 minutes.

Hand-Tissue Verification Same protocol replicated through hand tissue: dorsal-of-hand temperature recorded with a different test device in the palm. Same direction-of-effect documented; faster recovery on cool-off with the BioChip.

Funding Disclosure (Author's Own Words) From the Mazeh manuscript acknowledgements: "This was funded in part by EZ Technologies, manufacturer of the Bodywell® card. The author acknowledges being consultant scientist to EZ Technologies during the research period the paper was written. This research was conducted independently of the author's affiliation with Beaumont Health System." Methodology was reviewed by Dr. Bradley Roth, Dr. Carol Chandler, Prof. Moshe Einat, and Prof. Motti Haridim.

Deep dive: thermal study methodology, full disclosure, and FAQ

Methodology & Operations

Want the methodology, or the company side?

For testing philosophy and methodology framework, see the lab page. For company information, support, and 90-day return policy, see the trust page.

Methodology Overview About the Company

All Proven Results.Full test data and findings.

Want the methodology, or the company side?

All Proven Results.
Full test data and findings.