SAR Test Report - Up to 80% Reduction at an FCC-Accredited Lab | Bodywell® SAR Test Report - Up to 80% Reduction at an FCC-Accredited Lab | Bodywell® SAR Test Report - Up to 80% Reduction at an FCC-Accredited Lab | Bodywell® All Proven Results - Full Test Data and Findings | Bodywell® All Proven Results - Full Test Data and Findings | Bodywell®

All Proven Results.
Full test data and findings.

Comprehensive record of measurement results across the four research categories - SAR, EEG, pH, and thermal. Tables, charts, source documentation, and links to deep-dive methodology pages.

Learn how this was tested →

SAR Test Results 6 measurements EEG Findings 6 subjects pH Bio-Stabilization CUNY chart Thermal Imaging FLIR data

SAR · Specific Absorption Rate

SAR test results - up to 80% reduction.

Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) measures the rate at which radio-frequency energy is absorbed by tissue from a wireless device, expressed in watts per kilogram. The FCC regulatory ceiling for U.S. devices is 1.6 W/kg. Six independent device measurements were conducted at RF Exposure Lab using sugar-based brain-tissue simulant. Reductions ranged from 58.9% to 80.1%.

Institution: RF Exposure Lab, San Marcos, CA Accreditation: FCC #2387.01 Equipment: DASY52 by SPEAG Standard: FCC OET Bulletin 65 Supp C

SAR Data Summary excerpt - Galaxy S3, Chip 192, head SAR test, -80.3% percentage SAR change, signed by Jay M. Moulton (VP, RF Exposure Lab) — RF Exposure Lab SAR Data Summary excerpt - signed by VP Jay M. Moulton

Device · Band	Reference	With Bodywell®	Reduction
Device 1 · 836 MHz	0.485 W/kg	0.177 W/kg	−63.5%
Device 2 · 836 MHz	0.485 W/kg	0.156 W/kg	−67.8%
Device 3 · 836 MHz	0.206 W/kg	0.041 W/kg	−80.1%
Device 4 · 836 MHz	0.236 W/kg	0.097 W/kg	−58.9%
Device 5 · 1880 MHz	0.195 W/kg	0.046 W/kg	−76.4%
Device 6 · 1950 MHz	0.312 W/kg	0.121 W/kg	−61.2%

−80%

Upper bound of measured reduction Six independent device measurements across three transmit bands (836 MHz, 1880 MHz, 1950 MHz). Range: 58.9% to 80.1% reduction. The marketing claim "up to 80%" reflects the upper bound.

Named Contributors Executive summary compiled by Prof. Moshe Einat (Ariel University). Methodology and analysis cross-reviewed by Prof. Motti Haridim (Holon Institute of Technology).

Signal-Integrity Verification Independent TRP/TIS testing at the same FCC-accredited lab confirmed no measurable impact on signal transmission or reception. The Bodywell® does not block, attenuate, or interfere with cellular signal.

Deep dive: SAR study methodology, full report, and FAQ

EEG · Bioelectrical Brain Activity

EEG findings - alpha-rhythm increase in 6 of 6 subjects.

Clinical EEG pilot recording brain alpha-rhythm parameters (alpha-index and alpha-power) under four sequential conditions per subject: baseline, Bodywell® alone, phone alone, phone + Bodywell®. Conducted under International 10-20 electrode placement and ASET-aligned protocols. Six healthy adult subjects; each subject served as their own control across the four conditions.

Investigator: Regina Shmelkina Protocol: ASET-aligned clinical EEG Electrodes: International 10-20 placement Subjects: 6 healthy adults

EEG recordings before (without Bodywell®) and after (with Bodywell®) - six EEG channels showing changes in alpha-rhythm activity — EEG recordings - before (no Bodywell®) vs after (with Bodywell®), six channels

Subject	Background	Phone alone	Phone + Bodywell®	Δ Idx
1	8.9% · 77	10.2% · 89	21% · 117	+10.8 pp
2	91.5% · 98	52% · 115	55% · 214	+3.0 pp
3	82% · 67	73% · 53	75% · 80	+2.0 pp
4	22% · 62	69% · 67	80% · 67	+11.0 pp
5	96% · 101	89% · 83	95% · 117	+6.0 pp
6	28% · 86	92% · 98	93.5% · 93	+1.5 pp

6 / 6

Alpha-index increase across the cohort Every subject's alpha-index increased when the Bodywell® was applied during cellphone exposure, compared to phone alone. Alpha-power increased in 4 of 6 subjects. Statistical ratio: 1.34 ± 0.33 (P = 68%).

Cell Format Each cell shows alpha-index (% of recording time) · alpha-power (average amplitude). "pp" = percentage points. Source: Table 1, Shmelkina report.

Independent Review Methodology and conclusions independently reviewed by Prof. Moshe Einat (Ariel University) and Prof. Motti Haridim (Holon Institute of Technology).

Deep dive: EEG study methodology, full report, and FAQ

Signal-Integrity Verification

TRP/TIS testing - signal integrity under chip presence.

Independent Total Radiated Power and Total Isotropic Sensitivity testing was conducted to verify the Bodywell® does not attenuate or interfere with cellular signal.

TRP - Total Radiated Power

Measures the actual transmit power of the device. If the chip blocked or attenuated the signal, the modem would compensate by transmitting at higher power, and TRP would change. Result: little or no impact on TRP.

TIS - Total Isotropic Sensitivity

Measures device reception sensitivity. Signal attenuation would degrade TIS performance. Result: little or no impact on TIS. Reception is unchanged with the chip applied.

"The Bodywell® has little or no impact on TRP and TIS performance, indicating it does not interfere with the phone's transmission or reception."

- Jay M. Moulton, VP · RF Exposure Lab

The Bodywell® operates on the body's response to RF energy, not on device transmission. Signal-integrity testing confirms no measurable effect on phone connectivity.

pH · Cellular Bio-Stabilization

pH measurement - water chemistry under exposure.

Continuous pH measurement of water during cellphone exposure, conducted at the New York City College of Technology (City University of New York). Custom-built differential pH meter with 0.0242 pH-per-division resolution. Same vessel of water, same cellphone, same room across both sessions; the Bodywell®'s presence was the single varied input.

Institution: NYC College of Technology · CUNY Investigators: Prof. Aron Goykadosh, Dr. Mark Krinker Equipment: Custom differential pH meter Resolution: 0.0242 pH per division

CUNY pH bar chart - without Bodywell® pH drops from 7.25 to 6.80 over 20 minutes; with Bodywell® pH stays stable around 7.30 — CUNY pH bar chart - Blue = without Bodywell®, Red = with Bodywell®

Time	Without Bodywell®	With Bodywell®	Δ
0 min	7.25	7.25	-
4 min	7.15	7.28	+0.13
8 min	6.90	7.28	+0.38
12 min	6.85	7.30	+0.45
16 min	6.80	7.30	+0.50
20 min	6.85	7.30	+0.45

≈ 0

Stable pH across exposure window With the Bodywell® in place, water pH remained stable at ≈ 7.25–7.30 across 20 minutes of cellphone exposure. Without the Bodywell®, pH drifted into the acidic range, ending at ≈ 6.80–6.85.

Replication Same direction-of-effect documented across three different test devices and two different operating modes (active and standby).

Equalizer Verification Confirmed independently by placing the MobileTek Equalizer between the test device and the water vessel - the Bodywell® configuration is not required to be on the device for the effect to be documented.

Deep dive: pH study methodology, theoretical framework, and FAQ

Thermal · FLIR Imaging

Thermal imaging - peak skin heating reduced ~50%.

FLIR thermal imaging of skin and underlying tissue temperature during sustained cellphone use. Conducted under IAMT head-and-neck protocol with subjects oriented by Reid's base line. Same device, posture, room, and 45-minute exposure window across both sessions; the Bodywell®'s presence was the single varied input. All measurements taken at the same anatomical point (right pinna of the ear).

Author: Dr. Nachat Mazeh, PhD Test Site: Greenhill Thermography Center Camera: FLIR A320 (sensitivity <0.05°C)

FLIR thermography sequences - Before (without Bodywell®) showing intense red and white hot zones developing on the head, and After (with Bodywell®) showing markedly reduced heating across the same time intervals — FLIR sequences - Before (no Bodywell®) vs After (with Bodywell®)

Condition	Duration	Peak temperature	Δ from baseline
Baseline (no phone)	15 min acclimation	35.04°C	- reference -
Phone alone	45 min talk mode	37.08°C	+2.04°C
Phone + Bodywell®	45 min talk mode	36.07°C	+1.01°C

≈ ½

Peak temperature increase reduced ~50% Phone alone produced a +2.04°C rise over 45 minutes of continuous talk-mode use. With the Bodywell® on the battery compartment under identical protocol, the rise was +1.01°C - approximately half the heating, on the same person, in the same chair, in the same room.

Cooling-Curve Recovery After phone removal, the IR camera continued recording. With phone alone, skin temperature had not returned to baseline after 10 minutes of cooling. With the Bodywell®, recovery was documented at 11 minutes.

Hand-Tissue Verification Same protocol replicated through hand tissue: dorsal-of-hand temperature recorded with a different test device in the palm. Same direction-of-effect documented; faster recovery on cool-off with the Bodywell®.

Deep dive: thermal study methodology, full disclosure, and FAQ

Methodology & Operations

Want the methodology, or the company side?

For testing philosophy and methodology framework, see the lab page. For company information, support, and 90-day return policy, see the trust page.

Methodology Overview About the Company

All Proven Results.Full test data and findings.

TRP/TIS testing - signal integrity under chip presence.

TRP - Total Radiated Power

TIS - Total Isotropic Sensitivity

Want the methodology, or the company side?

All Proven Results.
Full test data and findings.