Lab
Bodywell® Lab — Testing Philosophy, Methodology, and Validation | Bodywell®
Free U.S. shipping · 90-day money-back guarantee Call us: (850) 988-8855

The Bodywell® Lab.
Methodology, validation, and findings.

An overview of how Bodywell®'s research is structured — testing philosophy, methodology, categories, and the institutions and contributors involved.

Bodywell®'s research and testing program is designed around a single principle: every product claim should be traceable to a specific measurement, conducted by a named contributor at a named institution.

This page describes the testing philosophy, the methodology framework, and the categories under which research is conducted. For full results and underlying data, see All Test Results.

Testing Philosophy

Independent measurement across distinct dimensions.

Research is conducted across deliberately different methods, instruments, and institutional structures. Each result is documented in isolation and evaluated on its own terms.

Two of the four study categories rely on instrument-only measurements with no human-subject input, reducing observer or subject bias. The remaining categories follow standard FCC and clinical protocols.

Institutional context varies across the program — third-party FCC-accredited testing, public-university research, independent clinical investigation, and industry-supported research with explicit funding disclosure on the manuscript.

Standards Applied Across Studies

1

Named institutional context

Each study identifies the institution and contributors responsible for the work.

2

Documented methodology

Equipment, protocol, and conditions are recorded with each measurement.

3

Stated limitations

Each study includes documented limitations, scope, and applicability boundaries.

4

Independent expert review

Methodology and analysis are reviewed by named experts at academic institutions.

Testing Categories

Four research categories.

Each category examines a distinct dimension of how RF energy interacts with biological systems. Full results, data tables, and source documentation are available on the all-results page.

SAR · Specific Absorption Rate

Energy absorption measurement

FCC-defined unit measuring radio-frequency energy absorbed by tissue from a wireless device. Tested under federal SAR protocol with sugar-based brain-tissue simulant.

Method: DASY52 robotic SAR system · Standard: FCC OET Bulletin 65 Supp C

EEG · Bioelectrical Brain Activity

Brain alpha-rhythm measurement

Clinical EEG measurement of alpha-rhythm parameters across multiple subjects under defined cellphone-exposure conditions. Conducted under International 10-20 electrode placement.

Method: Digital clinical EEG · Standard: ASET protocols

pH · Cellular Bio-Stabilization

Water chemistry measurement

Continuous pH monitoring of water under cellphone exposure, documenting changes in hydrogen-ion activity. Recorded with a custom-built differential pH meter.

Method: Differential pH metering · Institution: CUNY College of Technology

Thermal · FLIR Imaging

Skin-surface temperature measurement

Infrared imaging of skin and underlying tissue temperature during sustained cellphone use. Conducted under IAMT head-and-neck protocol with subjects oriented by Reid's base line.

Method: FLIR A320 medical IR camera · Sensitivity: <0.05°C

Curated Findings

Headline results across the four categories.

A summary of the most significant documented findings. Full data tables, charts, and underlying measurements are on the all-results page.

SAR

Up to 80%

Documented reduction in absorbed RF energy across six independent device measurements at an FCC-accredited lab. Range: 58.9–80.1%.

EEG

6 of 6

Subjects in the clinical EEG pilot recorded an increase in alpha-rhythm index when the BioCard was applied during cellphone exposure.

pH

≈ 0 drift

With the MobileTek BioCard in place, water pH remained stable across the 20-minute exposure window. Without it: −0.45 pH unit drift.

Thermal

≈ ½

Approximately 50% reduction in peak skin temperature increase over a 45-minute cellphone exposure window.

Validation and Expert Review

Independent contributors and recognized institutions.

Each study is associated with a named institution and contributor with documented professional history.

Recognized Institutions

City University of New York, Beaumont Health Research Institute, RF Exposure Lab (FCC-accredited), Ariel University, Holon Institute of Technology, Technion — Israel Institute of Technology.

Named Contributors

Each contributor is publicly identifiable with documented academic history: Prof. Aron Goykadosh (CUNY), Dr. Mark Krinker (CUNY), Dr. Nachaat Mazeh (Beaumont), Prof. Moshe Einat (Ariel), Prof. Motti Haridim (HIT), Regina Shmelkina (clinical EEG).

FCC-Accredited Testing

Specific Absorption Rate testing conducted at RF Exposure Lab, San Marcos, California — FCC Accreditation #2387.01. Independent TRP/TIS verification performed in the same lab.

Next Step

Review the underlying data and findings.

For full results, data tables, and source documentation across all four research categories, see the all-results page.