A neurologist’s evidence review
I reviewed more than 99 EMF products. These are the 5 tests that made Bodywell different.
Most EMF products rely on promises. I wanted to know who did the testing, where it was done, and what the results actually meant.
Dr. Kealoha reviewed the evidence for MobileTek® technology. The tests themselves were run by the researchers and laboratories named below.
What I wanted to know
I was not looking for a product that blocks or shields a phone. That can interfere with the signal and make the phone work harder.
Bodywell takes a different approach. Its MobileTek technology does not change the phone’s signal or reduce its output. It is designed to help the body respond differently during exposure.
I used the same four questions for every test: Who ran it? Where? What did they find? What does it mean in everyday terms?
Test 01
A lab tissue model absorbed up to 80% less RF energy.
SAR is a standard way to measure how much RF energy tissue absorbs. For me, this was the clearest place to start.
- Test details
- Location: RF Exposure Lab, San Marcos, California · FCC accreditation #2387.01.
Led by: Jay M. Moulton, VP of RF Exposure Lab. Summary compiled by Prof. Moshe Einat. - Result
- Across six device tests, the lab model absorbed roughly 59% to 80% less RF energy. That is why Bodywell says “up to 80%.” Results may vary.
- Why it matters
- The phone kept working. In the lab model, less RF energy was absorbed when the BioChip was present.
Source: RF Exposure Lab testing with DASY52 equipment and a sugar-based brain-tissue simulant under FCC-aligned standards. View the published results →
Test 02
The BioChip did not interfere with the phone’s signal.
I also needed to know that the BioChip would not weaken the phone’s connection. TRP and TIS tests measure that.
- Test details
- Location: Novatel Wireless, San Diego, California · ISO 17025 / A2LA accreditation #3228.01.
Led by: Jay M. Moulton, VP of RF Exposure Lab, signed the independent attestation. - Result
- The test found zero measurable impact on phone connectivity or service.
- Why it matters
- The BioChip does not block or change the signal. The phone can keep working normally.
Source: independent TRP/TIS verification summarized in Bodywell’s published research record. Read the summary →
Test 03
In thermal testing, the temperature increase was about half as large.
A heat-sensing camera measured the same spot before and after 45 minutes of phone use.
- Test details
- Location: Green Health Thermography, Ann Arbor, Michigan, with Beaumont Health Research Institute affiliation.
Led by: Dr. Nachaat Mazeh, Ph.D., using the IAMT protocol and a FLIR A320 camera. - Result
- After 45 minutes, temperature rose 2.04°C with the phone alone and 1.01°C with the BioChip. That is about half the increase. Results may vary.
- Why it matters
- With the same person, phone, room, and test time, the temperature increase was smaller with the BioChip.
Source: Mazeh thermal manuscript; same-point right-pinna measurement under controlled room conditions. See the data →
Test 04
In a small brainwave test, all six people showed an increase in the alpha measure.
As a neurologist, this is the test I paid closest attention to. Each person was tested under the same four conditions.
- Test details
- Location: Clinical EEG setting; the public report does not name the facility.
Led by: Regina Shmelkina, clinical EEG specialist, using International 10–20 electrode placement. - Result
- The alpha measure increased in all 6 participants when the MobileTek BioCard was present during phone exposure. Results may vary.
- Why it matters
- All six people moved in the same direction on the main measurement. That is encouraging, but it does not prove that the product treats a medical condition.
Source: Regina Shmelkina, 2012 EEG pilot; International 10–20 placement and ASET-aligned procedures. Review the results →
Test 05
In a water test, pH stayed stable when MobileTek was present.
Water cannot expect a result or experience a placebo effect. That made this a useful test of the technology itself.
- Test details
- Location: New York City College of Technology, City University of New York (CUNY).
Led by: Prof. Aron Goykadosh and Dr. Mark Krinker. - Result
- Over 20 minutes, water without MobileTek shifted from about pH 7.25 to 6.80–6.85. With MobileTek present, it remained around 7.25–7.30.
- Why it matters
- This was a measurable result that did not depend on how a person felt. It supports how the technology may work, but it does not prove a health benefit on its own.
Source: CUNY pH study using a custom differential pH meter under matched conditions. See the table →
Why I chose Bodywell
What convinced me was the pattern across all five tests.
One test measured RF absorption. Another made sure the phone signal stayed normal. The others looked at temperature, brain activity, and pH.
No single test proves everything. What mattered to me was that different researchers, using different methods, saw useful results. That is why Bodywell is the only EMF brand I trust, work with, and use with my clients.
See the Bodywell BioChip →The BioChip is for phones, tablets, and laptops. One chip is used per device. Individual results may vary.
